TEN GREATEST FILMS OF ALL TIME ; story of ist one;- casablanca : free movie s link ;-Watch Casablanca For Free On 123Movies.to https://123movies.is/film/casablanca.../watchi
TEN GREATEST
FILMS OF ALL TIME
by Roger Ebert
April 1, 1991
| Print Page
If I must make a list of
the Ten Greatest Films of All Time, my first vow is to make the list for
myself, not for anybody else. I am sure than Eisenstein's "The
Battleship Potemkin" is a great film, but it's not going on my
list simply so I can impress people. Nor will I avoid "Casablanca"
simply because it's so popular: I love it all the same.
If I have a criterion for
choosing the greatest films, it's an emotional one. These are films that moved
me deeply in one way or another. The cinema is the greatest art form ever
conceived for generating emotions in its audience. That's what it does best.
(If you argue instead for dance or music, drama or painting, I will reply that
the cinema incorporates all of these arts).
ALPHABETICALLY IST MOVIES
:
After seeing this film
many times, I think I finally understand why I love it so much. It's not
because of the romance, or the humor, or the intrigue, although those elements
are masterful. It's because it makes me proud of the characters. These are not
heroes -- not except for Paul Heinreid's resistance fighter, who in some ways
is the most predictable character in the film. These are realists, pragmatists,
survivors: Humphrey Bogart's Rick Blaine, who sticks his neck out for nobody,
and Claude
Rains' police inspector, who follows rules and tries to stay out of
trouble. At the end of the film, when they rise to heroism, it is so moving
because heroism is not in their makeup. Their better nature simply informs them
what they must do.
The sheer beauty of the
film is also compelling. The black-and-white closeups of Ingrid
Bergman, the most bravely vulnerable woman in movie history. Bogart
with his cigarette and his bottle. Greenstreet and Lorre. Dooley Wilson at the
piano, looking up with pain when he sees Bergman enter the room. The shadows. "As
Time Goes By." If there is ever a time when they decide that some movies
should be spelled with an upper-case M, "Casablanca"
should be voted first on the list of Movies.
I have just seen it
again, a shot at a time, analyzing it frame-by-frame out at the University of
Colorado at Boulder. We took 10 hours and really looked at this
film, which is routinely named the best film of all time, almost by default, in
list after list. Maybe it is. It's some movie. It tells of all the seasons of a
man's life, shows his weaknesses and hurts, surrounds him with witnesses who
remember him but do not know how to explain him. It ends its search for
"Rosebud," his dying word, with a final image that explains
everything and nothing, and although some critics say the image is superficial,
I say it is very deep indeed, because it illustrates the way that human
happiness and pain is not found in big ideas but in the little victories or
defeats of childhood.
I do not expect many
readers to have heard of this film, or of Yasujiro
Ozu, who directed it, but this Japanese master, who lived from 1903
to 1963 and whose prolific career bridged the silent and sound eras, saw things
through his films in a way that no one else saw. Audiences never stop to think,
when they go to the movies, how they
understand what a close-up is, or a reaction shot. They learned that language
in childhood, and it was codified and popularized by D. W. Griffith, whose
films were studied everywhere in the world -- except in Japan, where for a time
a distinctively different visual style seemed to be developing. Ozu fashioned
his style by himself, and never changed it, and to see his films is to be
inside a completely alternative cinematic language.
"Floating
Weeds," like many of his films, is deceptively simple. It tells
of a troupe of traveling actors who return to an isolated village where their
leader left a woman behind many years ago -- and, we discover, he also left a
son. Ozu weaves an atmosphere of peaceful tranquility, of music and processions
and leisurely conversations, and then explodes his emotional secrets, which
cause people to discover their true natures. It is all done with hypnotic
visual beauty. After years of being available only in a shabby, beaten-up
version usually known as "Drifting Weeds," this film has now been
re-released in superb videotape and laserdisc editions.
This film, not to be
confused in any way with "Heaven's
Gate" (or with "Gates of Hell," for that matter) is a
bottomless mystery to me, infinitely fascinating. Made in the late 1970s by Errol
Morris, it would appear to be a documentary about some people
involved in a couple of pet cemeteries in Northern California. Oh, it's factual
enough: The people in this film really exist, and so does the pet cemetery. But
Morris is not concerned with his apparent subject. He has made a film about
life and death, pride and shame, deception and betrayal, and the stubborn
quirkiness of human nature.
He points his camera at
his subjects and lets them talk. But he points it for hours on end, patiently
until finally they use the language in ways that reveal their most hidden
parts. I am moved by the son who speaks of success but cannot grasp it, the old
man whose childhood pet was killed, the cocky guy who runs the tallow plant,
the woman who speaks of her dead pet and says, "There's your dog, and your
dog's dead. But there has to be something that made it move. Isn't there?"
In those words is the central question of every religion. And then, in the
extraordinary centerpiece of the film, there is the old woman Florence
Rasmussen, sitting in the doorway of her home, delivering a spontaneous monolog
that Faulkner would have killed to have written.
Fellini's 1960 film has
grown passe in some circles, I'm afraid, but I love it more than ever. Forget
about its message, about the "sweet life" along Rome's Via Veneto, or
about the contrasts between the sacred and the profane. Simply look at
Fellini's ballet of movement and sound, the graceful way he choreographs the
camera, the way the actors move. He never made a more "Felliniesque"
film, or a better one.
Then sneak up on the
subject from inside. Forget what made this film trendy and scandalous more than
30 years ago. Ask what it really says. It is about a man (Marcello
Mastroianni in his definitive performance) driven to
distraction by his hunger for love, and driven to despair by his complete
inability to be able to love. He seeks love from the neurosis of his fiancee,
through the fleshy carnality of a movie goddess, from prostitutes and
princesses. He seeks it in miracles and drunkenness, at night and at dawn. He
thinks he can glimpse it in the life of his friend Steiner, who has a wife and
children and a home where music is played and poetry read. But Steiner is as
despairing as he is. And finally Marcello gives up and sells out and at dawn
sees a pale young girl who wants to remind him of the novel he meant to write
someday, but he is hung over and cannot hear her shouting across the waves, and
so the message is lost.
I do not have the secret
of Alfred
Hitchcock and neither, I am convinced, does anyone else.
He made movies that do not date, that fascinate and amuse, that everybody
enjoys and that shout out in every frame that they are by Hitchcock. In the
world of film he was known simply as The Master. But what was he the Master of?
What was his philosophy, his belief, his message? It appears that he had none.
His purpose was simply to pluck the strings of human emotion -- to play the
audience, he said, like a piano. Hitchcock was always hidden behind the genre of
the suspense film, but as you see his movies again and again, the greatness
stays after the suspense becomes familiar. He made pure movies.
"Notorious"
is my favorite Hitchcock, a pairing of Cary
Grant and
Ingrid Bergman, with Claude Rains the tragic third corner of the triangle.
Because she loves Grant, she agrees to seduce Rains, a Nazi spy. Grant takes
her act of pure love as a tawdry thing, proving she is a notorious woman. And
when Bergman is being poisoned, he misreads her confusion as drunkenness. While
the hero plays a rat, however, the villain (Rains) becomes an object of
sympathy. He does love this woman. He would throw over all of Nazi Germany for
her, probably -- if he were not under the spell of his domineering mother, who
pulls his strings until they choke him.
Ten years ago, Martin
Scorsese's "Taxi
Driver" was on my list of the ten best films. I think "Raging
Bull" addresses some of the same obsessions, and is a deeper
and more confident film. Scorsese used the same actor, Robert
De Niro, and the same screenwriter, Paul
Schrader, for both films, and they have the same buried themes: A
man's jealousy about a woman, made painful by his own impotence, and expressed
through violence.
Some day if you want to
see movie acting as good as any ever put on the screen, look at a scene
two-thirds of the way through "Raging
Bull." It takes place in the living room of Jake LaMotta, the
boxing champion played by De Niro. He is fiddling with a TV set. His wife comes
in, says hello, kisses his brother, and goes upstairs. This begins to bother
LaMotta. He begins to quiz his brother (Joe
Pesci). The brother says he don't know nothin'. De Niro says maybe
he doesn't know what he
knows. The way the dialog expresses the inner twisting logic of his jealousy is
insidious. De Niro keeps talking, and Pesci tries to run but can't hide. And
step by step, word by word, we witness a man helpless to stop himself from
destroying everyone who loves him.
This movie is on the
altar of my love for the cinema. I saw it for the first time in a little
fleabox of a theater on the Left Bank in Paris, in 1962, during my first $5 a
day trip to Europe. It was so sad, so beautiful, so romantic, that it became at
once a part of my own memories -- as if it had happened to me. There is
infinite poignancy in the love that the failed writer Holly Martins (Joseph
Cotten) feels for the woman (Alida
Valli) who loves the "dead" Harry Lime (Orson Welles).
Harry treats her horribly, but she loves her idea of him, he neither he nor
Holly can ever change that. Apart from the story, look at the visuals! The
tense conversation on the giant ferris wheel. The giant, looming shadows at
night. The carnivorous faces of people seen in the bombed-out streets of
postwar Vienna, where the movie was shot on location. The chase through the
sewers. And of course the moment when the cat rubs against a shoe in a doorway,
and Orson Welles makes the most dramatic entrance in the history of the cinema.
All done to the music of a single zither.
"28 Up"
I have very particular
reasons for including this film, which is the least familiar title on my list
but one which I defy anyone to watch without fascination. No other film I have
ever seen does a better job of illustrating the mysterious and haunting way in
which the cinema bridges time. The movies themselves play with time, condensing
days or years into minutes or hours. Then going to old movies defies time,
because we see and hear people who are now dead, sounding and looking exactly
the same. Then the movies toy with our personal time, when we revisit them, by
recreating for us precisely the same experience we had before. Then look what Michael
Apted does
with time in this documentary, which he began more than 30 years ago. He made a
movie called "7-Up" for British television. It was about a group of
British 7-year-olds, their dreams, fears, ambitions, families, prospects. Fair
enough. Then, seven years later, he made "14 Up," revisiting them.
Then came "21 Up" and, in 1985. "28
Up," and next year, just in time for the Sight & Sound
list, will come "35
Up." And so the film will continue to grow... 42... 49... 56...
63... until Apted or his subjects are dead.
The miracle of the film
is that it shows us that the seeds of the man are indeed in the child. In a
sense, the destinies of all of these people can be guessed in their eyes, the
first time we see them. Some do better than we expect, some worse, one seems
completely bewildered. But the secret and mystery of human personality is there
from the first. This ongoing film is an experiment unlike anything else in film
history.
Film can take us where we
cannot go. It can also take our minds outside their shells, and this film by Stanley
Kubrick is one
of the great visionary experiences in the cinema. Yes, it was a landmark of
special effects, so convincing that years later the astronauts, faced with the
reality of outer space, compared it to "2001." But it was also a
landmark of non-narrative, poetic filmmaking, in which the connections were
made by images, not dialog or plot. An ape uses to learn a bone as a weapon,
and this tool, flung into the air, transforms itself into a space ship--the
tool that will free us from the bondage of this planet. And then the spaceship
takes man on a voyage into the interior of what may be the mind of another
species.
The debates about the "meaning" of this film still go on.
Surely the whole point of the film is that it is beyond meaning, that it takes
its character to a place he is so incapable of understanding that a special
room--sort of a hotel room--has to be prepared for him there, so that he will
not go mad. The movie lyrically and brutally challenges us to break out of the
illusion that everyday mundane concerns are what must preoccupy us. It argues
that surely man did not learn to think and dream, only to deaden himself with
provincialism and selfishness. "2001" is a spiritual experience. But
then all good movies ALPHABETICALLY IST MOVIES;-
frist one
Casablanca (film)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Casablanca | |
---|---|
Theatrical release poster by Bill Gold
| |
Directed by | Michael Curtiz |
Produced by | Hal B. Wallis |
Screenplay by | |
Based on | Everybody Comes to Rick's by Murray Burnett Joan Alison |
Starring | |
Music by | Max Steiner |
Cinematography | Arthur Edeson |
Edited by | Owen Marks |
Distributed by | Warner Bros. |
Release date
|
|
Running time
| 102 minutes[2] |
Country | United States |
Language | English |
Budget | $878,000[3] |
Box office | $3.7 million (initial US release)[4] |
Casablanca is a 1942 American romantic drama film directed by Michael Curtiz and based on Murray Burnett and Joan Alison's unproduced stage play Everybody Comes to Rick's. The film stars Humphrey Bogart, Ingrid Bergman, and Paul Henreid; it also features Claude Rains, Conrad Veidt, Sydney Greenstreet, Peter Lorre, and Dooley Wilson. Set during World War II, it focuses on an American expatriate who must choose between his love for a woman and helping her Czech Resistance leader husband escape the Vichy-controlled city of Casablanca to continue his fight against the Nazis.
Story editor Irene Diamond convinced producer Hal B. Wallis to purchase the film rights to the play in January 1942. Brothers Julius and Philip G. Epstein were initially assigned to write the script. However, despite studio resistance, they left to work on Frank Capra's Why We Fight series early in 1942. Howard E. Koch was assigned to the screenplay until the Epsteins returned a month later. Casey Robinson assisted with three weeks of rewrites, but his work would later go uncredited. Wallis chose Curtiz to direct the film after his first choice, William Wyler, became unavailable. Principal photography began on May 25, 1942, ending on August 3; the film was shot entirely at Warner Bros. Studios in Burbank, with the exception of one sequence at Van Nuys Airport in Van Nuys, Los Angeles.
Although Casablanca was an A-list film with established stars and first-rate writers, no one involved with its production expected it to be anything out of the ordinary.[5] It was just one of hundreds of pictures produced by Hollywood every year. Casablanca was rushed into release to take advantage of the publicity from the Allied invasion of North Africa a few weeks earlier.[6] It had its world premiere on November 26, 1942, in New York City and was released nationally in the United States on January 23, 1943. The film was a solid if unspectacular success in its initial run.
Casablanca went on to win three Academy Awards – Best Picture, Director (Curtiz) and Adapted Screenplay (the Epsteins and Koch) – and gradually its reputation grew. Its lead characters,[7][8] memorable lines,[9][10][11] and pervasive theme song[12] have all become iconic and the film consistently ranks near the top of lists of the greatest films in history.
Plot[edit]
In December 1941, American expatriate Rick Blaine is the proprietor of an upscale nightclub and gambling den in Casablanca. "Rick's Café Américain" attracts a varied clientele: Vichy French and German officials; refugees desperate to reach the still-neutral United States; and those who prey on them. Although Rick professes to be neutral in all matters, it is later revealed he ran guns to Ethiopia during its war with Italy and fought on the Loyalist side in the Spanish Civil War.
Petty crook Ugarte shows up and boasts to Rick of "letters of transit" obtained by murdering two German couriers. The papers allow the bearers to travel freely around German-controlled Europe and to neutral Portugal, and are thus almost priceless to the refugees stranded in Casablanca. Ugarte plans to sell them at the club that night, and asks Rick to hold them. Before he can meet his contact, he is intercepted by the local police under the command of Captain Louis Renault, an unabashedly corrupt Vichy official. Ugarte dies in custody without revealing that he entrusted the letters to Rick.
At this point, the reason for Rick's bitterness—former lover Ilsa Lund—walks into his establishment. Upon spotting Rick's friend and house pianist, Sam, Ilsa asks him to play "As Time Goes By." Rick storms over, furious that Sam has disobeyed his order never to perform that song, and is stunned to see Ilsa. She is accompanied by her husband, Victor Laszlo, a renowned fugitive Czech Resistance leader. They need the letters to escape to America to continue his work. German Major Strasser has come to Casablanca to see that Laszlo does not succeed.
When Laszlo makes inquiries, Ferrari, a major underworld figure and Rick's friendly business rival, divulges his suspicion that Rick has the letters. In private, Rick refuses to sell at any price, telling Laszlo to ask his wife the reason. They are interrupted when Strasser leads a group of officers in singing "Die Wacht am Rhein." Laszlo orders the house band to play "La Marseillaise." When the band looks to Rick, he nods his head. Laszlo starts singing, alone at first, then patriotic fervor grips the crowd and everyone joins in, drowning out the Germans. In retaliation, Strasser has Renault close the club.
That night, Ilsa confronts Rick in the deserted café. When he refuses to give her the letters, she threatens him with a gun, but then confesses that she still loves him. She explains that when they met and fell in love in Paris in 1940, she believed her husband had been killed attempting to escape from a concentration camp. Later, while preparing to flee with Rick from the imminent fall of the city to the German army, she learned that Laszlo was alive and in hiding. She left Rick without explanation to nurse her sick husband.
Rick's bitterness dissolves. He agrees to help, letting her believe that she will stay with him when Laszlo leaves. When Laszlo unexpectedly shows up, having narrowly escaped a police raid on a Resistance meeting, Rick has waiter Carl spirit Ilsa away. Laszlo, aware of Rick's love for Ilsa, tries to persuade him to use the letters to take her to safety. When the police arrest Laszlo on a minor, trumped-up charge, Rick persuades Renault to release him by promising to set him up for a much more serious crime: possession of the letters. To allay Renault's suspicions, Rick explains that he and Ilsa will be leaving for America. When Renault tries to arrest Laszlo as arranged, Rick forces him at gunpoint to assist in their escape. At the last moment, Rick makes Ilsa board the plane to Lisbon with her husband, telling her that she would regret it if she stayed—"Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but soon and for the rest of your life."
Strasser, tipped off by Renault, drives up alone. Rick kills him when he tries to intervene. When policemen arrive, Renault pauses, then orders them to "round up the usual suspects." Renault suggests to Rick that they join the Free French in Brazzaville. As they walk away into the fog, Rick says, "Louis, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship.
মন্তব্যসমূহ
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন